(March 15, 2018 at 3:59 pm)Grandizer Wrote:*emphasis mine*(March 15, 2018 at 12:52 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: You said you'd only accept conclusive evidence, yet you clearly accept abiogenesis which there is no conclusive evidence for... so do you only accept conclusive evidence or don't you?
Well, I don't have any other reasonable option, in this case.
Quote:The evidence I presented is far more plausible than any case made for abiogenesis... Just sayin.
To be clear, you presented us with your interpretations of what you read on Wikipedia. And my argument is that your interpretations are way off.
And my answer to that was for you to provide sources to back up you argument, not provide your own interpretation.
Also, I interpreted nothing, I showed how the German language evolved from Akkadian, that is not interpretation, that is fact. As the language evolved so would the names of the gods, that is not interpretation that is fact.
Quote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Odin
Odin was known in Old English as Wōden, in Old Saxon as Wōdan, and in Old High German as Wuotan or Wōtan, all stemming from the reconstructed Proto-Germanic theonym *wōđanaz.
Do you think the name Jesus is the same in Aramaic?
