Which is the more arrogant claim:
1) I am certain that the is no god, because there is a lack of evidence and sound arguments for said entity
2) I am certain there is a god, because the arguments for his existence are sound and he personally communicates with me
Whether atheist are of the strong or weak variety, I'm afraid theists have a almost unparalleled monopoly on breathtaking arrogance.
1) I am certain that the is no god, because there is a lack of evidence and sound arguments for said entity
2) I am certain there is a god, because the arguments for his existence are sound and he personally communicates with me
Whether atheist are of the strong or weak variety, I'm afraid theists have a almost unparalleled monopoly on breathtaking arrogance.
"I still say a church steeple with a lightning rod on top shows a lack of confidence"...Doug McLeod.