(March 24, 2018 at 7:00 am)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote:(March 24, 2018 at 4:37 am)CapnAwesome Wrote: Maybe by talking to Mary? Or from the apostles talking to Jesus himself. It's a funny question though, since its a nonsense story. Why there would be missing years seems a more relevant question.
If these people could get Mary's story down while she was alive, why not get JC's words down first-person? She would have been 47-53 when he "died", and in those days a poor person would be ready to kick it at that age.
Yeah, but she is supposed to be alive when he died and present at the crucifixion. Seems like a logical source. Why not just record JC's words first hand is a different question, obviously there is no good reason. For that matter no good reason god wouldn't just tell us all directly himself.
This seems like a pretty small problem when you think about ALL the massive problems with.claiming the bible as divine.