(March 25, 2018 at 9:44 am)notimportant1234 Wrote:(March 25, 2018 at 9:31 am)Lok1 Wrote: Death by automobile is, most often, much more violent than being shot, regardless of intent. Ignoring the starkly disparate numbers shows a cold disregard toward easily available statistics. That leads to plausible presumptions that the motive(s) behind the marches are other than what is claimed.
We aren't discussing wich is more nasty, that is irrelevant. Regardless of the way you die you still die, comenting wich is a more violent death is irelevant . The fac is that car deaths are accidental and gun death are intentional, that is big fucking difference. Besides that car deaths are pressent in all developed countrys, gun deaths on the other hand are not, they are something specific to the USA.
The march claims stricter gun laws wich lead to fewer means of expressing violence wich leads to fewer murders( intentional deaths).
What part of "regardless of intent" can you not grasp? Do yourself a big favor and look into "reading comprehension" and how it can benefit you. Aside from repeating yourself in your first 2 sentences, you are either woefully uninformed, or simply lying about gun deaths being specific to the USA. I'm going with the latter, for obvious reasons; the internet is the most powerful information gathering/learning tool ever created. Your excuse for not taking advantage of it is inexplicable. Especially when it is so easily used to disprove blatant lies like yours.