RE: Atheism is impossible, I don't see how life can be created naturalistically.
September 2, 2011 at 4:18 am
(This post was last modified: September 2, 2011 at 4:25 am by Captain Scarlet.)
(September 1, 2011 at 5:43 pm)nicholas5000 Wrote: Atheism and Evolution are scientifically impossible.Baseless assertion and also false. Atheism cannot be proven wrong by science and evolution has been the ONLY accepted scientific theory in support of current biodiversity, paleontology, bio geography etc since it's discovery.
(September 1, 2011 at 5:43 pm)nicholas5000 Wrote: Atheism, the denial of the necessity for any intelligence in the establishment of the universe and all of the life within it has been proved to be scientifically impossible.
(September 1, 2011 at 5:43 pm)nicholas5000 Wrote: With the arrival of nanotechnology and microbiology, and the ability for scientists to examine DNA at the sub-atomic level, honest scientists all agree that DNA could not possibly have evolved as Darwin suggested. They all now agree that DNA had to have been the product of an incredibly advanced form of intelligenceWhat DNA research are you referring to at the 'sub-atomic' level. Do you even understand what you are writing? You fail ' The no true Scotsman' fallacy by using the pejorative 'honest' scientists. Darwin said nothing at all about DNA. And absolutely no, none, zip published research has ever been produced which claims DNA is the result of intelligent design. I'm imagining your thesis will now turn to the conspiracy theory the 'dishonest' scientists are holding back the 'honest' ones. which is as ridiculous as your arguments.
(September 1, 2011 at 5:43 pm)nicholas5000 Wrote: The Darwinian Atheist believes that DNA simply arrived on the scene by some form of cosmic chance or luck, not requiring any form of intelligent assistance. Of course, to make themselves sound less ridiculous, Atheists like to use the term Natural Selection to explain such things. Of course, Darwin’s Theory of Natural Selection is just that, a theory, which has now been scientifically proven to be false.I'm not sure what a Darwinian atheist is. But I'll assume I qualify. Darwin had nothing to say on the origin of life, just what happens once life gets started. The origin of life is the subject of abiogenesis which is an area of research with inadequate conclusions as to early life formed and thus opinions on this are suspended. You however prefer to infer that god zapped something into existence with nothing to back this up other than the ramblings of goat herding tribes, that scribbled some nonsense down in genesis. The only arguments that sound ridiculous are yours. The theory of natural selection, like the theory of gravity, the standard theory of particle physics, string theory are powerfully predictive models of their subject area explaining all facts currently understood. They have practical applications too, evolutionary theory is used in farming and agriculture. Basically they work. They are however falsifiable, they can be debunked if evidence is surfaced debunking them. So far not a single shred of evidence has been brought forward debunking evolution. The mindless arguments you put forward certainly won't, but keep trying!
[/quote]
"I still say a church steeple with a lightning rod on top shows a lack of confidence"...Doug McLeod.