RE: Apologists that may be lying
March 31, 2018 at 11:05 pm
(This post was last modified: March 31, 2018 at 11:07 pm by vorlon13.)
Their (inexplicable) compulsion and commandment to be a record keeping people has literally been the handbook of how all religions have formed and evolved. If the Mormons did it, rest assured, they use the same playbook all the religions do. The big difference with them is they did it all in the last 2 centuries and at one time or another, published via their own in house organs, EVERYTHING.
As a result of all those records, Mormonism is ESPECIALLY easy to debunk, AND Mormonism is also a guide for debunking other religions too. Probably explains quite a bit of the other religions hostility to Mormonism; it's is easily demonstrated to be an especially false religion, and in the manner of all it's chicanery, and underhandedness, it implicates other religions.
A common claim of Mormon apologist when asked a troubling question (like was Joes Smith really arrested and convicted of money digging, or did Joe Smith and the church hierarchy change almost EVERY revelation they received from God MULTIPLE times?) will respond to before researching the answer is a statement like "why if that were true it would disprove Mormonism!" and then they research the question, get their worst case scenario answer straight from 100 year old church publications, and then they have to cheese up some lame ass explanation of why despite the problem, overall Mormonism is still true, never mind their earlier characterization.
I love Mormonism, easy to debunk TOTALLY, and it can be done ENTIRELY with their own self published materials.
That Joe Smith, he was a peach, wasn't he ??
As a result of all those records, Mormonism is ESPECIALLY easy to debunk, AND Mormonism is also a guide for debunking other religions too. Probably explains quite a bit of the other religions hostility to Mormonism; it's is easily demonstrated to be an especially false religion, and in the manner of all it's chicanery, and underhandedness, it implicates other religions.
A common claim of Mormon apologist when asked a troubling question (like was Joes Smith really arrested and convicted of money digging, or did Joe Smith and the church hierarchy change almost EVERY revelation they received from God MULTIPLE times?) will respond to before researching the answer is a statement like "why if that were true it would disprove Mormonism!" and then they research the question, get their worst case scenario answer straight from 100 year old church publications, and then they have to cheese up some lame ass explanation of why despite the problem, overall Mormonism is still true, never mind their earlier characterization.
I love Mormonism, easy to debunk TOTALLY, and it can be done ENTIRELY with their own self published materials.
That Joe Smith, he was a peach, wasn't he ??
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
