(May 8, 2018 at 2:25 am)CDF47 Wrote:Bollocks. It is cockwombles like the religious that invent the borked idea that you MUST defend to the death the rights of the unborn yet promptly abandon them once born.(May 7, 2018 at 10:14 pm)Khemikal Wrote: How do you infer design based on specificity and complexity? Aren't general and simple things also designed? You told us that DNA and rocks are both designed.
The complexity and specificity allow us to infer design.
(May 7, 2018 at 12:32 pm)CDF47 Wrote: When I look at a car or a building, I infer design based on it's specified complexity.No you don't. You make that call based on comparison.
(May 7, 2018 at 12:32 pm)CDF47 Wrote: Don't twist my worst like child's play antagonistic debating.Nobody has to "twist" your words. Your words are stupid straight out of the box.
(May 7, 2018 at 12:32 pm)CDF47 Wrote: I said the entire universe is designedYes. You did. But you did not say what it was designed for. It was clearly was not designed for us, since the vast majority of it will kill us, so what was it designed for?
(May 7, 2018 at 12:32 pm)CDF47 Wrote: which is why even a dumb rock requires design here; however, the proof of design is in the complex and specific examples like DNA.Even dumb rocks will kill us at a whim. How is this designed for us? It clearly is not remotely designed for us. Who or what is the universe designed for?