RE: Van Tillian/Clarkian Presuppositional Apologetics.
September 6, 2011 at 4:50 pm
(This post was last modified: September 6, 2011 at 5:40 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
I have to ask Ryft, and this probably has more to do with you than our discussion, but. Why argue from god to logic on the one hand, as an explanation, but on the other label the concepts of logic as self evident, requiring no further elaboration? Is this not analogous to saying "the concepts of logic need no further explanation, they are self evident..and that explanation is god."?
What is the purpose of this argument, given what I understand to be the Calvinists view of salvation and atonement?
(found a way to ask a question in fewer words, always a plus)
What is the purpose of this argument, given what I understand to be the Calvinists view of salvation and atonement?
(found a way to ask a question in fewer words, always a plus)
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
