DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Joods]

ID and theology are separate topics although ID has religious implications as I have stated prior.

Bullshit.

The court in Kitzmiller v Dover found otherwise.

4.
Whether ID is Science

After a searching review of the record and applicable caselaw, we find that
while ID arguments may be true, a proposition on which the Court takes no
position, ID is not science. We find that ID fails on three different levels, any one
of which is sufficient to preclude a determination that ID is science. They are: (1)
ID violates the centuries-old ground rules of science by invoking and permitting
supernatural causation; (2) the argument of irreducible complexity, central to ID,
employs the same flawed and illogical contrived dualism that doomed creation
science in the 1980's; and (3) ID’s negative attacks on evolution have been refuted
by the scientific community. As we will discuss in more detail below, it is
additionally important to note that ID has failed to gain acceptance in the scientific
community, it has not generated peer-reviewed publications, nor has it been the
subject of testing and research.

Go peddle your theology elsewhere.  We are on to you.  And so is the court.

This was vs the Dover Area School District if I recall, pretty much right in my backyard. The local news went batcrap crazy over this.