DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[CDF47]

BS...My points stand correct.  Whenever I said something minor in error, I acknowledged it, and made correction (like I always do).

You made no acknowledgement or corrections.  Can we expect an acknowledgement and correction for your failure to acknowledge and correct?

Honestly, why is this lump of pathetic ideas so valuable to you?  I remember...aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaallllll the way back at the beginnning of thois thread, you told us that learning that id was garbage wouldn;t affect your faith, that you had no complex or specific attachment to it that rendered your faith irreducibly complex in it;s absence.  Well, you're being shown all of the ways that ID is garbage.  

I think you might need to make some acknowledgement and corrections to that as well.

(I had you pegged for an eye man, btw..but it was 50/50 eyes or flagellum.)

LOL...Sure.

I disagree.  I think I have shown the brilliance behind DNA design and molecular machines and the construction of the universe.

LOL...OK.

I can talk the eye. I prefer the flagellum though since it can operate as a pump under a different variation.  The human eye has design trade-offs which optimizes it in some circumstances but reduces it's capability in others.  It's designed to do what is needed for us humans.

---

BS...My points stand correct.  

Nope totally destroyed 

Whenever I said something minor in error, I acknowledged it, and made correction (like I always do).

Now that is BS

Agree to disagree. 

Agree to disagree.