DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[CDF47]

That's all you have to add?

I must admit that trying to talk to you is growing tedious. 203 pages of you giving barely more than one sentence answers and you think that's hard work? Life's going to be a surprise for you.

Your argument seems to be that you can tell that DNA is designed because it is complex, but you can't tell what isn't designed because everything in the world is designed.

Why then even mention DNA if everything in the world is designed? Why wasn't your OP just saying this without even trying to backup your assertion by pointing at something complex?

When pressed you just repeat previous assertions which have already been countered, and come up with meaningless nebulous terms like specified complexity, even though you can't actually say how it is different from normal complexity except for more meaningless descriptions like saying it is functional. And if pressed will just come up with some other short pithy statement that means nothing.

Not to mention using every fallacious argument under the sun. You have no idea of what a debate is and why people engage in them. You're just wasting everybody's time because you are not putting in any effort to convince people and are not wanting to learn more yourself.

You should read this List of fallacies

It's clear from the first few pages in this thread why TTA banned you.

Life is going to be hard for me?  You have no idea what I've faced in life.  

I've heard that before and refuted it.

I have learned in this thread actually.  I always learn in a debate. 

TTA banned me for no good reason.

---

The entire case was BS from what I read.  I read in one case the judge just copy and pasted the scientists notes and made minor tweaks.

..............?

ID provides great information on the design of living systems, creation of the universe,...  I never was so enthused about science then when I discovered ID a while ago.  I think it's great. 

ID provides -no- information on the design of living systems, or the creation of the universe.   Psuedo-science is often more interesting than the real deal.  You thinking it;s great doesn;t change the facts of what it is and what it isn't.

I believe the information comes from God.

Your beliefs are irrellevant to an accurate description of where the information in dna comes from.  I thought you said accuracy was important?

I already have worked hard for 203 pages.

---

Below are more irreducibly complex machines:

http://www.arn.org/mm/mb_ic.htm

Nope.

ID asks the hard questions.  It discovers some great answers as well.

Accuracy is important.

---

In The Origin of Species Darwin stated:
"If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down." This is the case with irreducibly complex systems.