(May 15, 2018 at 4:55 am)CDF47 Wrote:(May 15, 2018 at 4:47 am)Tizheruk Wrote: No we won't
Doesn't matter because what i said was true therefore your disagreement i meaningless
Doesn't matter because what i said was true therefore your disagreement i meaningless
No you are
It's important
Yes it very much is
Nope
Nope
No you have not
Nope
Yes
Yes
Yes
Nope all evolutionary biologists who stick to science.
Doesn't matter because what i said was true therefore your disagreement i meaningless
Everything concluding in ID
LOL...I disagree.
(May 15, 2018 at 4:50 am)SaStrike Wrote: Just here to contribute to the potential 1000 pages of spam. Oh and I'm an atheist by the way.
Welcome. I was hoping you would be a theist.
(May 15, 2018 at 4:54 am)Joods Wrote: Except that Bacterial flagellum isn't a motor. It isn't a machine. You are making a poor attempt at mixing biology with man made machines, such as airplanes. See below.
You can't do that. To do so would be like calling an apple the exact same thing as a Rubik's Cube.
https://www.britannica.com/science/flagellum
Yes, it is a molecular machine. See additional information below:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_machine
Proteins form into components of machines and into machines.
LOL referencing wiki's that can be edited by anyone. How about a peer reviewed journal or something by an accredited university, where actual scientific studies have been performed.
I provided you with the definition of Bacterial Flagellum. First and foremost - it has the key word "bacterial" in it. That alone points to biology and the study of bacteria, so quit being dense. You just look pathetic at this point.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.
