DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Angrboda]

Scientists are not finding that in these molecular machines.  They are finding that they are irreducibly complex or can serve as different machine types under different variants.  See post above.

The whole point is that irreducibly complex systems cannot have evolved by natural means because any system containing fewer parts would not function, and failing to function, the organism would not survive to be able to reproduce itself to eventually evolve the irreducibly complex function. If you admit that the organism could survive with a degraded irreducibly complex system, and thereby offer a path by which the irreducibly complex function could have evolved. By admitting that an irreducibly complex system had a functional precursor, even though the functions are different, you've essentially gutted the concept of irreducible complexity.

You're so bad at this that you don't even understand your own talking points. All that comes out of you is a river of nonsense.

---

-and now you;ve been wrong twice in as many posts about logical fallacies.  Like I said..wrong about literally everything.  I wonder if the acknowledgement and correction thread will be 200 pages long, too?

LOL...I was wrong about the flagellum and the pump being irreducibly complex but the system below it is irreducibly complex.  Not sure of any other errors.