(May 17, 2018 at 9:34 am)Shell B Wrote:(May 17, 2018 at 12:46 am)Godscreated Wrote: I disagree, scientist are drawing conclusions about planets they have never seen, saying they are this or they are that. When in reality they have no clue about those unseen planets. Many scientist today are writing things just to throw papers and information out there so they can claim they were the first to say this or that when and if those things are proven. This comes from scientist that are becoming disappointed by the way science is turning to guessing for the sake of fame.
GC
So you know enough about astrophysics to say they’re wrong?
here's the wonderful thing about that. I don't have to know anything about that or evolution or any of it really. all I need be aware of competing theories, most of which are as plausible if not more so. what makes a given theory mainstream thought is a foolish popularity contest where egg heads in their various fields of expertise vote on which one they like the best. often times the theory with the best funding. IE global warming/al gore.
So you see two theories both plausible.. so what makes you believe one and not the other? Faith. Faith in the mainstream. faith in the top egg heads and their popularity contest.
THAT is all I need to know to make the observation of faith in science.