Satirical logic for the atheistic mind

[Angrboda]

It take the same if not more faith to follow popcorn science, especially after all the failure popcorn science has predicted/warned us about, in our own world n our own life time, (Mini-Ice age by 2000 due to pollution, deforestation by acid rain in the arctic tundra, hole in the Ozone caused by cfc's global warming, global cooling, global climate change due to carbon surplus,(that can some how be fixed by carbon credits/tax, melting Ice caps (nasa says antarctic Ice growing at crazy rate)  let alone what what pop corn science says about planets and galaxies or even the beginning of time. . . . . . Why then is it sooo.. easy for you to see and make fun of the faith of other WHEN YOU ARE PRACTICING THE EXACT SAME THING?!?!?!?!?

Well, let's examine your thesis here, Drich.

There are several definitions of faith, but the two that seem to come up most frequently in relation to religion are a) trust in something that has proven itself worthy, b) firm belief in something without proof. Well, let's compare science and religion to see if the parallel upon which your satire depends actually exists.

What does science promise? Well, science as a rule doesn't make promises, but generally people who put faith in science do so in the hope that science will deliver meaningful progress, both in terms of longer lives and a higher quality of life.

What does the Christian religion promise? It promises that if you have faith in the life and resurrection of Jesus Christ, you will be rewarded with eternal life in heaven.

So what have the respective "religions" delivered with respect to their promises?

Science has given us modern agriculture and medicine, computers, cell phones, global communication, GPS systems, longer lives and an overall higher standard of living.

Christianity gives us more promises of an afterlife which no one can even demonstrate exists. In a word, nothing.

So which definition of faith appears most appropriate to science? That it is trust in something which has shown itself worthy. And which definition of faith applies to the Christian religion? The definition that faith is firm belief in things that have not been proved.

So, no, Drich, you didn't create a meaningful satire by copying Valkyrie's post and substituting a few words, and you haven't shown that anybody is a hypocrite for finding your lame parody strange and not finding Valkyrie's satire similarly puzzling. All you've accomplished is showing that you don't know what the fuck you are talking about.

As noted previously, you are a fucking moron, as well as a liar for Jesus.