(June 14, 2018 at 4:07 am)Godscreated Wrote: You're the one getting emotional and because why, because we express what we know? I have no problem living with telling people about hell, it's the most horrible place anyone could be and I believe it would be dishonest to not warn people.
There is no Hell. There is no evidence of it and no reason to even suggest it even exists. And if it did exist it would violate the laws of thermodynamics. And all you have to say otherwise is a magic book that is a claim and not evidence. So why should I listen to you?
(June 14, 2018 at 4:07 am)Godscreated Wrote: If you were standing on the beach and those with you did not know what a tsunami was and you saw the water rushing away from the shore line would you just leave without warning them. Is their ignorance of a tsunami and what it will do a reason to leave them standing there to find out on their own. Wouldn't it be better to save the few who might listen than let all suffer the ravages of the tsunami.
The analogy fails because there is evidence of tsunamis, both geological and recorded on camera. The process is understood as well as the causes of them. Tsunamis are not implausible and do not violate physical laws.
(June 14, 2018 at 4:07 am)Godscreated Wrote: Just because you do not accept what the Bible says doesn't mean it's not true.
Same goes for the Quran. Or the Norse myths. Or Beowulf or any other ancient religion. But rather than believe in them all, it's better to determine which is more plausible if you're going to base your life on it. Your own magic book is not plausible.
