(June 26, 2018 at 12:53 pm)Drich Wrote:(June 26, 2018 at 12:16 pm)Jehanne Wrote: That's a "Yes," then?
It's neither. It's acknowledgement that such a theory exists, but I do call into question the accelerated evolutionary timeline needed for the next period to be on time. Meaning more animals survived the Kt event that what was estimated. which means animals thought lost at a moment in time may have carried on 100's of thousands of years longer than predicted.
I am also saying that there are other theories scientific in nature that do a lot better job explaining the fossil record than darwinism.
Can you point to any scientific papers and/or textbooks that support your POV?