RE: I tried to warn the Bernie and Hillary busters.
June 28, 2018 at 6:39 am
(This post was last modified: June 28, 2018 at 6:42 am by Brian37.)
(June 27, 2018 at 6:47 pm)ReptilianPeon Wrote:(June 27, 2018 at 4:07 pm)Chad32 Wrote: What are the corporate democrats doing to pull in progressives and independents? That's what they need to win. If they don't, they should expect to continue losing. Or be replaced.
Well yeah. I remember all of the people criticizing Hilary from her left were being talked down to and accused of being sexiest so that Hilary didn't have to address her corruption and address issues which she didn't feel comfortable talking about. Hilary kept going on and on about: "I'm with Her" and sexism. In particular, I remember the quote by Hillarybot Madeleine Albright:
“There is a special place in hell for women who don't help other women."
Then, in spite of all that transpired, Hilary endorses Andrew Cuomo over Cynthia Nixon For NY Governor, thus ensuring that she gets her special place in Hell (why isn't Madeleine Albright criticizing Hilary Clinton for not supporting another woman?). Why didn't Hilary want to help Cynthia Nixon break through a glass ceiling? Video by Secular Talk:
And guess what happens? Republicans start acting like Hilary to push for criminals. i.e. if you don't support Gina Haspel in her efforts 'break the glass ceiling', thus becoming the first female head of the CIA then you are misogynistic. Secular Talk reports:
"White House Hides Behind McFeminism To Push Wár Criminal CIA Head"
Video
If Hillbots were consistent (which they are not) and the choice at the election was between Eva Brawn and somebody like a Nelson Mandala they would have vote for Eva Brawn or be exposed as hypocrites. It would, after all, be totally sexist not to help the wife of Adolf Hitler to 'break the glass ceiling', wouldn't it? Identity politics can and is used to stifle a healthy exchange of ideas: the cooperatists in the Democrat (and now the Republican too) Party push the identity politics agenda so that they guilt people into voting for objectivity bad candidates and, therefore, get crooks elected. Hilary won't to admit that she didn't endorse Andrew Cuomo over Cynthia Nixon because Cynthia doesn't like the corrupt system of government in the USA (Hilary loves the legalised bribery of politicians).
I remember hearing somewhere that novel Fahrenheit 451 talks about identity polices and how it lead to an erosion of free speech and the need for "firemen" to burn books. I should really read that book someday. Point is, people need to be very careful what they wish for.
This shit right here is why we have a inept dangerous bully in office.
AND please, if you hate her so much, and I never get a good answer, please explain to me why Bernie ended up throwing his support behind her?
Oh and FYI, liberals are not going to take away free speech, that is fucking bullshit. If anyone would do that it would be Trump who has refused to condemn Nazis and KKK members. Go do your homework on American history. Bigots were the ones who silence the speech of dissent. It has always taken a progressive to expand rights to more people.
Trump is the corrupt one. He hides behind his family to keep his businesses, he has had a history of fucking over contractors and investors, he has had multiple failed businesses. And that is on top of being a fucking bully whom has attacked even war heros, on top of vilifying our watchdog press and his own intel.
Oh, and another book, Orwell's 1984. Trump is what that book was warning about. Animal Farm too.
