(July 18, 2018 at 9:54 am)Anomalocaris Wrote:(July 17, 2018 at 9:04 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: Although nice to look at I don't think they are very accurate renditions.
How so? Granted some of the surface features depicted may nor be the most typical of what would be encountered on each of those bodies. Such as on airless mercury, which has been geologically dead for several billion years, it should be uncommon to find rugged rock formations exposed on the surface that has not been worn down to subdued rounded form by billions of micrometeror impacts.
But what do you think is distinctly wrong and impossible?
Perspective and lighting. Impossible is your word, not mine.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
