(August 9, 2018 at 9:42 pm)bennyboy Wrote:(August 9, 2018 at 9:35 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: They seem interesting in theory, but, then again, it would appear that Peterson falls afoul of #8 quite a bit, (notably, his infamous opposition to Bill C-16 being based on fundamentally wrong interpretations of the law), and #10 (so much vagueness). I'm willing to suspect that, in his new life as darling of the alt-right, he's flouted #9 quite a bit. I don't know enough about his personal life to review his stances on rules #1-7, 11-12.
Also, I don't think someone who sounds (and to a lesser extent looks) so much like Saul Goodman should be lecturing people about moral rectitude:
The alt-right might like him, because he argues very effectively against PC bullshit. However, I wouldn't categorize him as alt-right or even as someone who feels any connection to the alt-right.
I didn't necessarily say he was alt-right. I said he was one of their darlings. It's a shockingly wide net, and they have really low standards for who they accept as one of them.
He himself does not particularly like the alt-right, and I do agree with him on this point that the alt-right and the PC-left are fundamentally the same:
But he really hedges his bets about explaining why, exactly, they're bad, and his alt-right fans love him for it.
Really, if you want to look into critiques of PC culture, Kyle Kulinski does a damn good job of doing it and NOBODY mistakes him for a right-winger:
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.
![[Image: harmlesskitchen.png]](https://i.postimg.cc/yxR97P23/harmlesskitchen.png)
I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
![[Image: harmlesskitchen.png]](https://i.postimg.cc/yxR97P23/harmlesskitchen.png)
I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.