(August 13, 2018 at 2:22 pm)Tizheruk Wrote:(August 13, 2018 at 2:07 pm)paulpablo Wrote: This is a quote by you....
The claim has now changed from him saying something to he's implied something.
The claim has also changed from he's saying "Women who wear make up should not be allowed to complain about sexual assault." to a different claim that he's made an implication that she bears some of the blame for being sexually provocative.
So yes the claim has obviously changed and for this other claim you'd still have to explain where the implication is.
3.No it's not he's clearly saying women who dress sexually provocatively partially invite there own harassment and thus are hypocrites if they complain thus have no right to complain if it happens . So nothing has changed
This is a different claim to what you originally said but it's also wrong. He explained that make up and high heels are sexual signaling.
I think that make up and high heels are sexual signaling but don't believe I should be able to sexually harass women and they shouldn't complain about it.
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
Impersonation is treason.
