RE: Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Round 2
August 20, 2018 at 12:37 pm
(This post was last modified: August 20, 2018 at 12:38 pm by possibletarian.)
(August 20, 2018 at 12:27 pm)alpha male Wrote: You should read the material before commenting. The person went out of their way to tell the bakery what the cake was for. And, on the day that the first case was decided. This was intentional. I suppose Divine thinks it was done out of love...
So what ? Why should it being intentional or not make a difference, in fact it's normal to tell a baker of any kind if you want a cake made to specifications your reasoning behind it. This is a fight for legal rights, I have no doubt that some black people intentionally asked for certain services and rights to stir the debate.
That's how you fight bigotry, and that's how you fight for your rights you cannot unintentionally fight for your rights.
'Those who ask a lot of questions may seem stupid, but those who don't ask questions stay stupid'