Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 6, 2025, 1:14 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Round 2
RE: Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Round 2
(August 20, 2018 at 3:31 pm)Tiberius Wrote:
(August 20, 2018 at 3:26 pm)U Catholic_Lady Wrote: Hmm, I don't know... I'm not sure if that would fly as being something that is against the event itself rather than against the person, which should be the only "limit" in my opinion. There is no fundamental difference between a black person graduating and a white person graduating. Since it is only an issue of skin color, it sounds like a case where the Baker is against the person themselves, and not the event.

But...there’s no fundamental difference between a same-sex wedding and a hetero wedding either. It’s only an issue of the sex of the partners.

What if the baker’s religion told him that graduation ceremonies for blacks were against God? Does that change the issue for you?

I’m trying to understand what difference there is. At some point in your mind it becomes not ok. What is the differentiator?

I need to get going, but do definitely want to come back and talk about this bc I am on the fence about it and can see pros and cons and arguments to both sides, depending on which extreme is taken.

Maybe a real quick response would be that marriage itself is considered a religious sacramental ceremony to a lot of people, and so they have certain beliefs surrounding it. Particularly that it is a union between one man and one woman, and that's it. Graduation doesn't have ties to any sort of deep seeded sacramental or religious beliefs, neither does it make sense that it would. So I would call BS on the person who tried to pull that card.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Round 2 - by Catholic_Lady - August 20, 2018 at 3:43 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Gog Magog civil war with the west WinterHold 37 5275 July 20, 2023 at 10:19 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Women's Rights Lek 314 42327 April 25, 2023 at 5:22 am
Last Post: The Architect Of Fate
  Colorado shooting, 5 dead. brewer 0 501 December 28, 2021 at 8:11 pm
Last Post: brewer
  New Zealand - you gotta be this old to have rights. onlinebiker 123 15357 December 13, 2021 at 5:18 pm
Last Post: The Architect Of Fate
  J.K. Rowling had to return civil rights award Silver 68 9263 October 16, 2020 at 10:39 am
Last Post: Rank Stranger
  [Serious] G-20 leaders, don’t forget the women’s rights advocates rotting in Saudi prisons WinterHold 47 5261 September 23, 2020 at 6:26 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Ghanem Almasarir, Saudi Human Rights Activist attacked in London WinterHold 3 979 October 12, 2018 at 4:02 am
Last Post: WinterHold
  Fuck Your Property Rights, You Scumbag Bastard Minimalist 0 696 October 1, 2018 at 5:20 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker A Theist 371 72104 June 14, 2018 at 2:41 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Did civil war begin in Saudi Arabia? WinterHold 6 1118 April 22, 2018 at 9:31 pm
Last Post: Minimalist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)