RE: Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Round 2
August 20, 2018 at 6:56 pm
(This post was last modified: August 20, 2018 at 6:57 pm by Angrboda.)
(August 20, 2018 at 6:50 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:(August 20, 2018 at 6:20 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: He can choose not to make wedding cakes. He can choose not to make birthday cakes. He can't choose to discriminate against a protected class. In the state of Colorado, where he chose to do business, gays and Transgender are among the protected classes.
It really is that simple.
The State of Colorado is telling a guy who makes 48 cakes a year that they have a compelling state interest in deciding who he may or may not serve with bespoke products. This, after the Supreme Court has already ruled that the State of Colorado was targeting this small family-owned business out of malice for his religious beliefs. And now you all are going to tell me that, somehow the person being oppressed is the lawyer who went out of his way to set-up the baker for a second lawsuit. Please. Pick on someone your own size.
That is not what the supreme court decided at all. But you appear to be making up facts to suit as you go along, so I don't know that there's any point in correcting you. Like the ADF, you are intentionally conflating the actions of the original plaintiff with those of the Colorado Civil Rights Commission. Presumably you think this will escape scrutiny so you can continue pushing bullshit and lies. It has not.
Have I mentioned that I think you're a dishonest and unethical piece of crap lately? I'd kind of walked back on such things given your overall good behavior, but I'm beginning to see that this was probably a mistake.