Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Round 2

[Angrboda]

Your still ignoring the fact that the customer gave the significance of the pink and blue colors and what they wanted to convey. And what the cakeshop denied. You can call that opinion, bit you still are creating lies to slander a person.  If he had subsequently denied a cake without this symbology, then you may have a point, and I would stand with you in descriminating against a person. Bit that is not the case.

I'll simply refer you to Neo's "point of fact" in the prior case about what is considered discrimination of a protected class and what is not. To quote, "Colorado has announced the general rule that expressive business owners, including cake artists, do not violate the public-accommodation law if they decline to create a custom item expressing a message that they would not communicate for anyone." Your opinion, apparently, is that Phillips declined the cake because of a specific message. Whether he did so is a matter of fact which is not decided simply by your say so. And whether he also discriminated against a protected class is also a matter to be decided. He may have been doing both. The facts in the matter are neither completely clear, nor univocal. So, no, I'm not creating lies to slander anybody. And yes, you're still confusing your opinion with fact. If you're going to throw similar accusations against me in the future, I suggest you get your ducks in a row first. You seem to have skipped that step in this case. The only person here who appears to be making shit up is you. But I suppose we're all used to that by now, so by all means, carry on.