Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Round 2

[Angrboda]

It's not difficult to understand.  Nor is the point that analogies which are sufficiently dissimilar to the case being discussed carry no weight.  That, too, shouldn't be difficult to understand.

So basically you understand what I was trying to say, but twisted it to mean something else. I think that is a better example than defense of what I was getting at.

I didn't twist shit, asshole. I said quite plainly that you were making an inappropriate analogy. How you see that as twisting shit is beyond me. It's a relatively simple and obvious objection. That you think you can make something out of that which it wasn't seems to be just more bullshit on your part. I understood what you were saying and made a relevant objection to it. That you now want to misrepresent that as twisting your meaning is pure unadulterated horseshit. You're neither clever nor correct. So you can take your claim and shove it up your ass.