Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Round 2

[RoadRunner79]

So basically you understand what I was trying to say, but twisted it to mean something else. I think that is a better example than defense of what I was getting at.

I didn't twist shit, asshole. I said quite plainly that you were making an inappropriate analogy. How you see that as twisting shit is beyond me. It's a relatively simple and obvious objection. That you think you can make something out of that which it wasn't seems to be just more bullshit on your part. I understood what you were saying and made a relevant objection to it. That you now want to misrepresent that as twisting your meaning is pure unadulterated horseshit. You're neither clever nor correct. So you can take your claim and shove it up your ass.

Sorry, it was late when I responded, and I think I was confusing your post with others. How do you think that it is a weak analogy? I was really making an analogy, but a connection of leaving out information purposely in order to deceive. Why do you think that is incorrect?

---

I didn't twist shit, asshole.  I said quite plainly that you were making an inappropriate analogy.  How you see that as twisting shit is beyond me.  It's a relatively simple and obvious objection.  That you think you can make something out of that which it wasn't seems to be just more bullshit on your part.  I understood what you were saying and made a relevant objection to it.  That you now want to misrepresent that as twisting your meaning is pure unadulterated horseshit.  You're neither clever nor correct.  So you can take your claim and shove it up your ass.

He tried doing that to me several pages back. I think it's his go to. You know, when he fully knows a person understands his points, but doesn't agree, he uses the tactic of "Oh, you're twisting what I said". 

What bullshit.

Its not because you disagree, but how you do it. And not accurately representing others. I’ve made my points, if they are ignored at this point, there is not much I can do.

The facts are that the owner denied the job, because of it’s content, not because of descrimination against the person. He would sell goods and custom goods to this person, but not the specific content he was being asked to create. He has also denied content which demeaning towards the LGBTQ. Colorado law, allows for a business owner to refuse such custom services, when they have issue with the content. No examples have been presented, where a person was refused services because of their sexual preference.