Peterson's 12 Rules For Life, have you heard of this?

[bennyboy]

What do you mean why wouldn't I lead with it?  That's the second time I've shot down your affinity for scientific racism by mentioning control groups used in IQ studies.

The trouble, Benny, is that you don't have facts, you have racism in search of a redeeming justification.  Scientific racism won't provide you with that, nor will complaints of white victimization, nor will parodying or just outright bullshitting about pc or sj platforms.

Nothing will, lol.

Okay, let's go ahead and examine the truth of this being the "second time I've shot down your affinity for scientific racism"

---

In some metrics, black people at least in the US, clearly ARE inferior-- in average IQ scores for example.  Then we have to ask why-- is it because the IQ tests are biased toward white participants?  Or because socioeconomic conditions lead to bad education?  Or because  of differential intelligences (intellectual tasks vs. social skills vs. physical intelligence), and only a narrow range of those being tested?

And then, we have to ask-- EVEN IF there are actual racial differences, should it matter at all with regard to rights of citizenship?  I'd certainly argue not.

This is the first I mentioned IQ scores in this thread.  Let's look at all your posts since then, and see if your current claim, that you keep debunking me, is correct:

#613: you headslap and say: "You're not just reading the alt right script..at this point, you're following the playbook too."

#615: you ignored the data I'd posted, and talked about networking. . . then said I had "swallowed the koolaid"

#618: you claimed that trying to raise IQ by reducing childhood health issues was pointless, because of the networking problem

#620: I think this is what you call "debunking."  You issued a truly incoherent sentence talking about controlled groups and smoking, having been divorced, or or possessing a credit card.  In the post immediately following, I told you that I couldn't understand your language, and asked you to clarify.  You most definitively did NOT produce any factual evidence supporting whatever claim it was that sentence was supposed to be about.

#622: You responded to my request for clarification, not with clarification but with "Go figure out for yourself, again..as you implored peopled to do with racist mouth-droppings."

#624: You ask ME to explain what a control group is, and still do not clarify your sentence from #620, and still do not produce any factual evidence supporting whatever claim it was that sentence in #620 was supposed to be about.

#626: You ramble about the pc movement and about politicians and celebrities

#628: You go on again about my "white victimization complex" and tell me to own my racism.

#630: You tell me I really am a racist, and tell me to stop "normalizing racism"

#632: You tell me a "racist is a racist," right after being told that 3 month babies show preference for same-race faces.  Then you call me a "slimy piece of shit."

#634: You tell me I've wasted your time and squandered whatever respect you had for me.

#641: You claim that "scientific racism" has been debunked a plural number of times

#643: You finally produce facts. . . kind of. . . but no link.

---

So you spewed out some garbled, drunken nonsense, which you refused to clarify upon request, and for which you provided no link or image.  Then you raged and called me names for 7 posts.  Then you finally gave something that looks like meaningful stats, but didn't bother linking your source.

You've also been repeatedly calling charts of IQ tests and SAT scores "scientific racism."  This is dumb for two reasons-- first of all, they are not that; they are clearly just test scores. Second, I myself, right from the moment I introduced the topic of IQ (i.e. in both post #612 and AGAIN in post #617) openly suggested that there were multiple ways to look at the IQ numbers:

There are several possibilities:
1) The test is bullshit (either it's culturally biased, or it doesn't actually measure intelligence that matters)
2) The results are either a lie, or are reported in a way so biased that it constitutes fraud.
3) Black people, on average, are in fact not as intelligent as white people, on average, and this hurts their chance to generate income.

This is me just constantly pushing the right-wing agenda, huh? Yeah, because those are the kinds of options that White Supremacists usually talk about when engaging in this kind of material?