Eternal bliss

[Angrboda]

Are these other people also not yogis?  Fail again.  

Everybody here thinks that you're an idiot and a fool.  Are you sure you want to go with the idea that what everybody thinks is true?

But there's a bigger problem here.  You tell me to ask people who believe meditation and yoga lead to God whether meditation and yoga lead to God.  Of course they are going to say so, because you've selected them because they believe that.  Ask people who believe the earth is flat and they'll tell you that the earth is flat!  Duh!  It's tautological.  Ask people who think chocolate ice cream is the best and you'll find out that chocolate ice cream is the best!  Are you really this stupid? That you would think that it is evidence of anything only proves that you're a brainless twat.  No, the real test is to ask a random selection of wise people.  And such a random selection of wise people will tell you different things.  You yourself have said in the past that yoga isn't the only way to get there, so you're even contradicting yourself.  So once again you show yourself to be the idiot that you are.  

Idiot's like you aren't remotely qualified to tell a real yogi from a fake yogi.  Tell me, what exactly are your qualifications for telling a fake yogi from a real yogi?  Are you claiming special knowledge or skill?

You don't have the first clue what a real yogi is.  You think your ignorance is evidence.  It is not.

How on earth you expect that someone who does not do serious meditation would be able to tell you something that make any sense about meditation?  

It would be like pretending that a plumber is an expert in the electrical field or the other way around.
Can't you see how stupid you are?    

Who is saying anything about meditation other than that it isn't the only way to realize divine truth? You're suggesting that "serious" meditators know that it is. That's just plain stupid. Second, you're assuming that I haven't done "serious" meditation. I have. So we're back to one opinion against another opinion. And no matter how many people you line up who believe that meditation is the way to God, I can line up an equal number who say that meditation is not the only path to realization of ultimate truth. So, at the end of the day, it's just opinion against opinion. Like I said, if you ask flat earthers their opinion, you know what you'll get. So, first of all, you don't even understand the problem. And second of all, you're appealing to people who already believe that something is true in order to determine that it is true, AND THAT IS THE ONLY THING YOU ARE APPEALING TO. That's a fallacious argument to authority, in addition to everything else. If I said to you, me and these 1,000 atheists believe that the brain produces consciousness, would that be evidence that the brain produces consciousness? No, of course not! That you can see it with respect to 1,000 atheists but not with respect to 1,000 "serious" meditators only shows that you hold double standards about the subject. You're being a fucking idiot again.

So, still no evidence that I am not a yogini, just a bunch of people who might agree with you. That's not evidence. Try again.

Do you have any actual evidence that the police planted those bombs and firearms?  No?  I didn't think so.  A theory of a conspiracy, without any evidence, is just a conspiracy theory.  Nothing more.

Would you employ a Known pedophile to look after your young daughter?

That is what I am trying to tell you yog.  
You can not possibly believe anyone who let his own people starve and suffer like those corrupted and materialistic people who run India.  

Wake up and grow up yog before dementia take hold of you.  
[/quote]

If I did employ a known pedophile to look after my young daughter, after he had looked after her for a night, would his being a known pedophile be evidence that he molested my daughter? No, it wouldn't. Some in the Indian police are and were corrupt. Some politicians are corrupt. That doesn't mean that all politicians are corrupt. Or that they are corrupt all the time. You need some actual evidence that the police involved were known to be corrupt AND that they were acting corruptly in the case of the Ananda Marga searches. You don't know either. So you've got squat! You don't even know the names of the officers involved. Your argument simply doesn't wash. It's just more bullshit.