On Hell and Forgiveness

[Amarok]

A.k.a. confirmation bias. You view the world through the lens of naturalism and then dismiss anything that isn't explainable by naturalism. Then you judge people who consider sources based on their merit and pronounce them delusional. Your statements sounds more like stubborn closed-mindedness than rational reflectiom

Only you could interprate that statement in this way Wooter too bad he did not say that . not accepting supernatural explanations or sources is not assuming naturalism . But as a Theist i can see why that gets your panties in a bunch because the supernatural is an easy thinking free way of explaining anything .