(September 6, 2018 at 12:25 pm)Khemikal Wrote: I have explained to you that complaints of white victimization and some imaginary cryptomarxist end of the western world are batshit crazy rightwing talking points. This is not an argument, it is a statement of fact. It it's modern incarnation, both tunes go back as far as 1970...and yet here we still are, rights and all. Whites still haven't been rounded up by their black oppressors. What..about that, should I have to argue in, for you?
This is you:
1) Claim that any white guy who discusses any aspect of race relations "complains of white victimization."
2) Argue that white victimization isn't a thing.
I say I don't like the race card being pulled out as a substitute for actual responsibility in the work place. You call this "complaints of white victimization."
I say that IQ, race, and income are strongly correlated. You rant on about white victimization.
I say I will actually donate money to a charity if you will cite your sources. You somehow. . . quite miraculously. . . have managed to avoid citing the sources, and gotten right back on track with the crowing about white victimization.
Here's what I think. I think I'm a proxy for your father (I think that's who you said it was), and you're arguing against his positions, rather than mine. It's like that time I asked my wife to put on a Wonder Woman costume, I guess.
