(September 10, 2018 at 7:34 am)Eik0932 Wrote: I see the point but bad argument. Religion was created to find a purpose (obviously i dont buy into the theory that it was made because people were too stupid about science, they obviously had science back then)
Depends what you mean by science. Sure people were trying to figure stuff out, but they did not have the scientific method as we currently use it, with peer review , falsifiability, reproducibility, conferences, papers with a literature review etc
(September 10, 2018 at 7:34 am)Eik0932 Wrote: Also i dont understand why Atheists supports cannibalism through consent. Isnt it obvious evil knowing its your own kind? Seems some messed up atheists online being in support of it. Consent doesnt always makes it right just saying
And I don't understand why theists believe in polygamy, child slavery, martyrdom and are so against blood transfusions.
(September 10, 2018 at 7:34 am)Eik0932 Wrote: In either case. To explain the philosophy of purpose. May i direct the all known question of "why is a rock a rock and not something else question, or pain or suffering?" the physical explanation is there, but it doesnt tell why it even is a thing, whats the point of it?
There is no point. Why assume that everything has to have a purpose? You have no reason to believe that. It's like assuming that the purpose of a puddle is to fill in an indentation in the ground. No, water fills in the indentation as it naturally flows / falls downwards. We came along and then defined it as a puddle. Same with the rock. It's the result of a process that happened.
If you are asking why things happen, then I suggest that you learn a natural science such as physics. We know why rocks form, and how
