Cosby Sentence

[Joods]

How do you know it doesn't exist if you haven't looked for it? 

Because all I have to do is look at why the jurors said they convicted him to know there was no evidence of any rape.

Juror says Bill Cosby's own words led to his conviction 

 

Well there's your evidence right there. His own words. What do you not understand about self incrimination?

Harrison Snyder, in an interview with ABC's "Good Morning America" that aired Monday, said he believed Constand's claim that Cosby assaulted her in 2004 at his home in a Philadelphia suburb.

And, Snyder, said, the testimony of five other accusers who testified was not necessary for the conviction. "I don't think it really necessarily mattered that these five other women were here because he said it himself -- that he used drugs for other women," Snyder told "GMA."

 
bold mine. Again - self incrimination. 

So this Jurors believes he was guilty because he gave drugs to women who took them of their own free will, remember this was in the 70's, it has NOTHING to do with Constand which occured in 2004. Also in that very same deposition he stated he never had sex with Constand.




So basically the Juror believes he was guilty based on what happened in the 70's, long past the statute of limitations. If the deposition is what broke the camels back, then what actual evidence could they possibly of had?

 

First of all, showing only four lines of transcripts doesn't make the entire trial. I believe you're twisting things to make your point. Second of all, that's not what it says above. Again - you're twisting things to suit your own agenda. [/quote]