(October 6, 2018 at 8:06 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: You just need to provide evidence from non biased sources, who don’t believe what you are claiming, lived during the time that your claim occurred, with video and a Nobel prize. Otherwise you have no evidence.
Nope. Just about ANY amount of CREDIBLE evidence is usually sufficient in order to accept a claim as at least a realistic possibility, warranting further investigation. It does scale somewhat with the prior probability, though, so if you want us to believe in magic - you'd better have something better, than some old book of tall tales, written by iron age goat-herders.
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw
