Cosby Sentence

[Joods]

One was actually convicted in a court of law, the other was never charged.

---

Was Milk convicted of the crime you allege he committed.

No he was not.

Was Cosby convicted of rape.

Yes he was.

Did a large number of other women say he raped them , yes they did. 

So you defend the convicted rapist and vilify the person not charged or convicted and you call me hypocrite.

So let me get this straight.

Are you and Judy saying that if a person commits a crime but is not convicted he should get a pass?

LOL Figures that'd be the takeaway you got from what we said. 

I think we're done here because either you're intentionally being obtuse or you really are this fucking stupid.

---

Oh, the irony...lol.

Not really, I stated that if Cosby was a gay man, DBP would be defending him. As you can see, I wasn't wrong.

But he's not gay so the fact that you again, try to spin something out of the air that has NOTHING to do with the PD of this thread, is just incredible. 

First - you get your panties in a twist because the victim won and you felt he didn't get a fair trial due to the fact that you didn't like the evidence that was presented.

Then you try, as usual, to play the race card. 

When that didn't work, you took a totally unrelated an rather irrelevant post of DBP's that you decided to quote mine out of context, that had fuck all to do with Cosby or any of his accusers, and attempted to spin it into this thread. I'm not even going to address what you quote mined of mine. We all know you'll just keep on getting away with it. Whatever. The point is that several of us wasted many pages calling you out and telling you how off the mark you are with bringing up an example that had nothing to do with Cosby and wasn't even in the same realm of reality as Cosby's trial. 

Technically - you should have received at the least, a temporary ban for doing that since it's against the rules to take posts out of context and you've done it a few times before, but oh well. You get to stay and play on the playground for whatever reasons. And no - that's not a dig at staff. It's just frustrating to see you skirt the rules so well that your quote mining is constantly subject to opinion-based decisions and not based on the fact that yes, you do in fact, break the quote mining rule here. You've become a professional at pissing people off while staying right under the line. Bravo!

And now you're going for the "but you'd defend him if he was gay" angle, again? Why? Because you have nothing left to argue after we've dismissed everything you've tried to throw at us? Puleaze. Get a fucking grip. 

The bottom line to this entire bullshit thread topic is that Cosby was found guilty. He is now a registered sex offender. His lawyers will appeal it based on things they didn't agree with. You can't rush the outcome and you aren't on his legal defense team so what you're whining about in a forum, is beyond me. Sometimes I think you just need to look for something to argue about because, well, that's a thing you do. 

This has NOTHING to do with Harvey Milk or Harvey Milk's sexual orientation or the fact that he was a disgusting pervert who had an unhealthy and immoral relationship with a 16 year old child. Everyone involved with that situation is dead. You bringing it up, in this thread is a moot point. Let it go already because it doesn't have anything to do with this thread topic. If you want to talk about Harvey Milk, start a new thread, man. Trying to talk about it in this thread is against the PD in the rules. 

I'd ask what the ever loving fuck is wrong with you but anyone who's been here for any length of time already knows. 

You need Jesus.