RE: Subjective Morality?
October 20, 2018 at 7:13 am
(This post was last modified: October 20, 2018 at 7:42 am by The Grand Nudger.)
(October 20, 2018 at 1:07 am)bennyboy Wrote:(October 19, 2018 at 2:08 am)Khemikal Wrote: Then your moral appraisal is subjective. Easy enough, right? An objectivist would tell you that it was some thing x about rape, not some thing x about your opinion that made it wrong.
What about rape would make it wrong? Wrongness implies some metric by which it might be contrasted with rightness. But wrongness and rightness are ideas. Other than in the minds of agents, where would such ideas exist, independent of the agent who considers them?
Doesn't matter. Any proposition that says "this thing about rape x makes it wrong" is..at least..an attempt at an objective moral appraisal. If they get it wrong, because thing x isn't true, or because thing x isn't cogent metric, then they're wrong (but still objectively wrong, lol).
Here I have to ask you the obvious question..though, can you actually not think of anything about rape that makes it wrong? Yes, I have opinions, you have opinions, we all have opinions...and those opinions exist in our minds.....but you don't have any opinions about that....?
The existence of opinions and their place in the mind does not make any other thing necessarily subjective. We contend that some opinions are fact based, and others are free floating opinions. Since a moral realist sees a moral proposition as the equivalent of any other (purported) fact..this would also be true of moral statements. The simple fact that you are expressing your opinion isn't enough to determine whether the moral statement is subjective or objective, and this is mostly due to the fact that both subjective and objective statements or positions are privately held in the mind (which is the sense of subjectivity to which possesion of the concept refers).
I can only say this so many ways and so many times...but moral realism does not contend that we are not necessarily subjective agents who hold opinions. That this is true is not a counterargument to the position. The question being asked (by moral realism, in contrast to moral subjectivism, lol) is not whether you have an opinion...but whether some x causes that opinion, or whether the opinion causes some x. That's the ground floor. Does it purport to report facts.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!