RE: Subjective Morality?
October 22, 2018 at 12:30 pm
(This post was last modified: October 22, 2018 at 12:32 pm by robvalue.)
The problem is that "wrong" / "immoral" means absolutely nothing at all (scientifically) without a non-circular definition. Once you’ve made that definition, you’ve moved away from morality itself, and into the study of behaviour and consequences under specific goals. You’re then talking about achieving and enacting certain stated ethics, according to the vision of a person or group of people.
It’s the equivocation between the defined "wrong" and the general "wrong" that leads to mistakes I often see.
It’s the equivocation between the defined "wrong" and the general "wrong" that leads to mistakes I often see.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum