Subjective Morality?

[robvalue]

There are no physical facts about morality.  There are physical facts which one considers morally.

Show me any physical fact which is moral in nature.

I agree.

It’s a bit like the current trend of some people finding facts to be sexist or racist, or whatever. You’re not allowed to refer to how things actually are, but as they should be.

---

PS: the weird thing is, Khem must ultimately be describing the same set of circumstances, but doing so in such a way that makes no sense to us. (I’m the spokesperson for subjective international.) So I suppose we're dealing with different uses of language and fundamental philosophical approaches.

It can’t be a matter of opinion whether or not there are facts about something; all that can happen is those facts, if they are real, being described through different frameworks.

I’m still not sure if we're dealing with scientific facts or logical truths, though. There’s the language problem: for me, a scientific fact cannot be moral in nature. It must by definition be amoral.