For an example in thread.
Vulcan has some sympathies for non naturalism. I'm going to just call him a non naturalist for purposes of this example. We're both objectivists, but lets assume that I answer yes to every question on that chart. I land in analytic functionalism.
Between us...a cogent disagreement on morality cannot lie in the judgement dependent, error, or noncognitivist theories. We have excluded those items together. Our moral positions are in disagreement, but implicated with each other by the rejection of mutually exclusive propositions to -both- of us.
Vulcan has some sympathies for non naturalism. I'm going to just call him a non naturalist for purposes of this example. We're both objectivists, but lets assume that I answer yes to every question on that chart. I land in analytic functionalism.
Between us...a cogent disagreement on morality cannot lie in the judgement dependent, error, or noncognitivist theories. We have excluded those items together. Our moral positions are in disagreement, but implicated with each other by the rejection of mutually exclusive propositions to -both- of us.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
