Can you still be an atheist after this?

[Statler Waldorf]

---

Ok, so to remind the viewers at home, we started here:

You’d have a tough time finding one historian who believes Jesus was a myth no matter whether the historian was a Christian, Muslim, Atheist, or whatever.

So to recap, the personal leanings of the historian don't matter, whether they are Christian or not. We will have a very tough time finding someone who believes Jesus was a myth. Hope we're all clear on that.

*El Dinero easily finds just such a thing*

Now watch as famous illusionist Statler Waldorf uses distraction techniques to move the goalposts!

Not weird at all, can you name a historian who does not have a vested interest in scripture being untrue who denies the resurrection of Christ?

You found an 18th century French philosopher who thought Jesus may have been a myth, wow very impressive.

So from 'you won't be able to find anyone' it moves to 'that person doesn't count because of their personal leanings which I previously said were irrelevant'. And why does the fact that they were French or lived in the 18th century matter? Hilarious changing of the criteria, and a convenient ignoring of the fact that I told you he was the first name among several just among one Wikipedia article, which as we all know should be used for a rough overview of subjects. I'm quite confident that I would be able to find many more examples if I searched further. But since I've already conclusively disproved the original challenge above, is there any need?

I don't give a toss about the rest of your boring argument that contains your usual mental gymnastics, doublespeak and logical fallacies. But try not to make stupid statements that can be refuted using Wikipedia in the space of two minutes.

---

Well I have seen no evidence that the man you came up with ever questioned the existence of Jesus, but rather he questioned the historical accuracy of what we understand of Jesus. I apologize though; I should have included the word “modern” or words “alive today” when I had said that. I just assumed it was pretty apparent to most people. I had no idea you’d bring up some philosopher who merely questioned the historicity of Christ not even his existence and who had been dead for 200 years.