You know, I said we were done talking after you cited a carefully staged, edited and produced propaganda piece by Pat Robertson as some sort of irrefutable testimony but you attempted to answer my question so I suppose I should explain to you why your arguments were fallacious.
You said we were done talking because you ran away from our debate in a cowardly fashion. Your claim was that the testimony of billions of people could be dismissed, so I produced that particular video because I feel the testimony in it is powerful and difficult to dismiss. I asked you to attempt to dismiss it, I never said it was irrefutable. You, performing rather poorly in the debate, decided to end it and use the excuse that my use of a video from the 700 club somehow proved I wasn't worthy of any further reply. What it really proved was that you were grasping at straws, especially as it pertained to the hypocripsy of your beliefs about God, and cut and ran to escape further questioning.
Most of the rest of this post is entirely fallacious. You asked why homosexual love is evil. I gave you an explanation and some reasoning as to why God considers it a sin. Your reply is to say that it is fallacious to appeal to God as an authority. Could you be any more obtuse? Your question doesn't address the question of whether He is an authority on human relations; it is clearly presumed by the line of argumentation. If you want to address the reply under the terms you laid out, instead of shifting them mid argument, then we can proceed further.
You said we were done talking because you ran away from our debate in a cowardly fashion. Your claim was that the testimony of billions of people could be dismissed, so I produced that particular video because I feel the testimony in it is powerful and difficult to dismiss. I asked you to attempt to dismiss it, I never said it was irrefutable. You, performing rather poorly in the debate, decided to end it and use the excuse that my use of a video from the 700 club somehow proved I wasn't worthy of any further reply. What it really proved was that you were grasping at straws, especially as it pertained to the hypocripsy of your beliefs about God, and cut and ran to escape further questioning.
Most of the rest of this post is entirely fallacious. You asked why homosexual love is evil. I gave you an explanation and some reasoning as to why God considers it a sin. Your reply is to say that it is fallacious to appeal to God as an authority. Could you be any more obtuse? Your question doesn't address the question of whether He is an authority on human relations; it is clearly presumed by the line of argumentation. If you want to address the reply under the terms you laid out, instead of shifting them mid argument, then we can proceed further.
(September 26, 2011 at 9:12 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: [of morality?
