RE: Objective Morality?
September 27, 2011 at 2:05 am
(This post was last modified: September 27, 2011 at 2:19 am by DeistPaladin.)
(September 27, 2011 at 12:39 am)lucent Wrote: Actually, I don't watch the 700 club. I found the video on youtube, and it doesn't matter one iota who produced it.
I assume you at least watched the video? You found that piece to be credible and the testimony convincing enough to smugly present it? That's why I found no point in discussing anything with you.
Quote:The way your question is framed, asking why something from a Christian standpoint is *evil*, implicates God as a moral authority and requires a biblical explanation. Asking why I think it is wrong, personally, is a entirely different question. If you can construct a coherent question without the use of Ad Homs, I'll be inclined to answer you.
The question was already constructed. Why is love evil when the body parts are similar?
(September 26, 2011 at 11:29 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Poor Waldork...still trying to convince the court that his invisible sky-daddy is an expert witness.
OVERRULED!
...and Yahweh is held in contempt of court for failing to show up.
Luckily for him, he won't have to worry about any fines or serving time for it, on account that a non-existent being can't be served any citation.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
