RE: Possibly restricting photo sizes?
November 4, 2018 at 1:19 pm
(This post was last modified: November 4, 2018 at 1:21 pm by Angrboda.)
(November 4, 2018 at 1:11 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:(November 4, 2018 at 1:00 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: Except that imgfit blows up small pics to fit the screen size which results in ugly pics and an overwhelming experience even on regular size pics when viewed on a desktop or good sized laptop. If imgfit would shrink but not enlarge pics, that would work, but it doesn't.
And what would the point be of restricting photos to sizes so small that imgfit isn't a good solution?
First, I'm not sure I understand your question, or where it's coming from, but the positives of not using imgfit are multiple.
No pixelation of small images. No image shock on desktop monitors. Images which are suitably sized instead of massive. Maybe you like being accosted by 23" images, but I don't.
(November 4, 2018 at 1:16 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: I didn't try imgfit because I can't predict what screens it will be viewed on. My partner at Hyperwar tried to get me to restrict certain files to specific sizes "because they fit better on the screen". My reply was "which screen, your cell phone or my 27" monitors?"
With the cost of large screen TVs, plenty of people are using monitors upwards of 30". Imgfit is ridiculous overkill on such screens.