Gay "cure" therapist outed

[Rev. Rye]

Homosexuality can be criticized mainly for it turning sex into a useless act, and interrupt the natural goal of sex -being meant for reproduction-.

That's why it's a sin, in my perspective.

Bolding mine, just so you wont backpedal (which you will do anyway).

What about elderly couples having sex?
What about usage of condoms?
What about (hetereosexual) anal sex?
What about having sex during the time of the month your wife can not get pregnant?
What about pulling out?
What about vasectomy, getting ovaries removed, or the antibaby pill?
What about infertile men (with bad sperms)?

Did you ever have sex without trying to reproduce?

Bonus question: If sex was intended by god for reproduction, why can a man not willingly control his ejaculation on one hand, but it releases massive amounts of endorphines on the other hand?

Oh, and quit being so obsessed with what other adult and consenting people are doing in their bedroom, you muslim pervert! Or are you just trying to apply for the job of the Pope?

Okay, in all seriousness, back when we as a nation were still debating whether or not gay marriages should be a thing, I once did this post pointing out the basic problem with the "gay marriage should be forbidden because it can't result in children" argument:

So, if same-sex marriage is wrong mainly because it can't result in biological offspring, it should follow that the following couples have no right to be married.

[*] A man whose wife lost the ability to bear children.
[*] A woman and a man who has had a vasectomy.
[*] Any man and woman who choose to not have kids.
[*] Any elderly couple, since women tend to go through menopause sometime between the ages of 45 and 55. Should marriages be dissolved as soon as the woman go through menopause?

Tellingly, I doubt this columnist will even mention any of these scenarios, even though, by the very same logic he uses, they have as little right to marriage as gay people.