Subjective Morality?

[The Grand Nudger]

[quote='Khemikal' pid='1846605' dateline='1541978182']
It's -not- an argument against moral realism, it's an argument -for- moral realism, lol....?

There's no further arguing, you're done.  You've agreed to moral realism, and that's that.  

What you need to figure out now, is why you thought (and still think) that you didn't agree with moral realism.

You are like the chick that wears a low-cut blouse without a bra, and shouts "Stop staring at my tits."

I've given my position, and it's very clearly an argument for subjective morality,

the trouble is that it's not...

[quote]
since it predicates morality on feelings. 

Nope...that;s not at all what you've repeatedly said.

[/quote]
Nope.  Your own idiosyncratic definition includes feeling..ideas..and environment.  The simple fact of the latter two's inclusion is enough to establish moral realism.  You don't realize that...I get that..but that is the fact of the matter.

You can talk around it all you want, but unless you can demonstrate any objective truth that necessitates a particular ought with no subjective evaluation required, then move along.  Stop trying to make this thread about your tits.

Already have, and you've already agreed to them.

Lemme ask you again, to give you a chance to contradict yourself......again.....

Does your toe exist? If it does........qed.