DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Everena]

Yes, but what we are discussing is the concept of atoms and electrons existing in two places at once, and quantum entanglement is just part of the theory of quantum mechanics. You all should know this, since it is how we are able to have advanced technology. 

Congratulations to Drs. S. Haroche and D. Wineland for winning the Nobel Prize in Physics. 2012
These two physicists got the Prize for doing experiments once thought to be impossible, i.e. studying single atoms and single photons (particles of light).

They proved the correctness of the bizarre properties of quantum mechanics, i.e. that electrons can be two places at the same time. Einstein himself hated this idea, but he was wrong on this one. It sounds preposterous that electrons and atoms can be in many states at the same time, but this is the foundation of modern civilizations. Lasers, transistors, computers, the internet etc. are all based on quantum mechanics. It has been tested to 1 part in 100 billion in accuracy, making it the most successful physical theory of  all time. Except that it is based on feet of clay.

The idea that you can be in many places at the same time can be proven indirectly, by looking at the properties of many atoms, but testing it on single atoms and single photons was beyond reach. Until now.

Dr. Wineland put a single atom in a box, and then hit it with a photon of light.

Dr. Haroche did the opposite. He put a single photon in a box, and then hit it with an atom.

In both cases, the experiments verified quantum mechanics."

That's superposition, not quantum entanglement, which, as already noted, is a property of the quantum wave function, not of particles or atoms.

And you need to cite your sources.

Yes and that is exactly what I said and then you brought up quantum entanglement, which is part of the theory of quantum mechanics. Anyway the whole point is yes atoms and particles CAN exist in 2 places at once as I asserted. It has proven repeatedly and no one questions it, so stop arguing against it. 

Here is the Nobel prize website and the article citation.  
https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2012/press-release/
https://bigthink.com/dr-kakus-universe/nobel-prize-awarded-to-two-quantum-physicists

---

I know all that. I was the one who said superposition and then she brought up quantum entanglement and went on and on about how an atom and a particle or electron cannot possibly exist in 2 places at once. I am already fully aware that it can and that was my entire point to begin with, and they are all part of the theory of quantum mechanics which has been proven beyond any and all doubt and is being used all over the world and has been for years and years now. Quantum biology is now theorizing that bacteria can exist in 2 places at the same time and it is just a matter of time before we prove this is possible on the macro level.   https://www.scientificamerican.com/artic...milestone/

Then why are you talking about "spooky action at a distance" having anything to do with superposition, (YOU posted the article link about something that had NOTHING
to do with what you were talking about). Obviously you are very confused. You already posted this article, and nowhere does it say anything about a bacteria being in two places at once, and you can quote NO PLACE in it, that it does say this. You're simply lying out your ass.

I am not confused at all. I was quoting an article that was about EXACTLY what I was talking about. I think you have some mental health issues, and the article regarding bacteria is right there in my last post.