DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Amarok]

I get what you think about quantum mechanics, even if I disagree with it.  But setting that aside, I fail to see how even your own understanding of quantum mechanics leads you to think that it supports your specific beliefs.  It would probably help if we knew what those specific beliefs were.  If it's that we can exist in two places at once as a superposition of quantum states, that in itself doesn't seem to lead to the type of beliefs that you've been putting forward.  So as long as you're here, why don't you explain in what way you think these quantum effects support your beliefs.

I'd also like answers to my previous questions, unless of course you're just here to troll.

---

For what it's worth, I don't care if she is a sock.  It's a breath of fresh air compared to the mind numbing repetition of CDF47.  This too seems to be becoming something of a rut, but I'll enjoy it while it lasts.  I don't actually think she's a sock, but it wouldn't shock me if she were in some way related to Little Rik.

I have to work now, but I will be happy to discuss this later.

---

Really no one 

https://qz.com/1294941/a-debate-over-pla...uman-mind/

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/...gent-plant

https://www.pri.org/stories/2014-01-09/n...out-plants

https://www.forbes.com/sites/andreamorri...akes-root/

https://www.scientificamerican.com/artic...chamovitz/

https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016...gbooktalk/

---

That does not remotely follow so non sequitur

Even if they are, it does not explain why they would all be here to feed us unless it was because of GOD, And no one in the science community seriously thinks plants are consciously self aware. It is only speculated about.

1. That wasn't your claim your claim was no believes their conscience that was clearly a lie wither speculative or not and the weight of the evidence suggests it's not no matter how much you toss around the word "speculative" to dismiss inconvenient idea's 

2. Again none of that follows thus again non sequitur

So you have failed yet again . You are clearly out of you depth .