DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Everena]

It was stumbled into? Are you kidding? We have genitals and males and females can reproduce and you are seriously going to pretend that we just stumpled into our sex drive? Did we trip over something when we were drunk and stumple into it? I mean, come on!

And we have reproductive organs so obviously there is a very incredibly important intent behind everything. Wake up!!!!

Your utter lack of understanding about the process of natural selection and evolution is not an argument.
Everena: I understand evolution and natural selection far better than you do. It is a process fool, not a first cause of anything. The ability of have a sex drive and genitals had to be there inititially or it never would have happened!! What part of that is HARD for someone like you to understand? Perhaps read it twice and then retake high school level biology.



 Every post you make displays how completely ignorant you are of the sciences.  Random changes happen as organisms reproduce; natural selection filters the changes that enhance survival from those that hinder it.  We are not an intentional end product and trying to explain things by assuming that we are is just wrong.  Once you let go of that erroneous and incredibly arrogant assumption things make much more sense and don't require a magical overseer.

God did not create our true selves, we always have been and always will be. God created our flesh here. Obviously we are in serious need of improvement to deserving of  an eternal paradise and some much more than others.

Evidence please.  What would be the point of creating fleshbots that are "in serious need of improvement" to entrap pre-existing spritis in order to "test" them to see if they are worthy?  The gnostic ideas were dismissed as heretical nearly two thousand years ago.  You are behind the curve on this one.

I refuse to believe any unfair, unjust, cold, cruel world theory.

Good for you but you sound like a 4-year-old stamping her little feet and refusing to east her green beans.  When you start with what you want to be true your conclusions are worthless.

That is not true at all. There is a ton of credible evidence from Dr Ian Stevenson alone.

Only if you are incredibly gullible. There are many claims but nothing testable or verifiable.


"So the universe is not quite as you thought it was. You’d better rearrange your beliefs, then. Because you certainly can’t rearrange the universe." -- Isaac Asimov

---

Your utter lack of understanding about the process of natural selection and evolution is not an argument.
Everena: I understand evolution and natural selection far better than you do. It is a process fool, not a first cause of anything. The ability of have a sex drive and genitals had to be there inititially or it never would have happened!! What part of that is HARD for someone like you to understand? Perhaps read it twice and then retake high school level biology.



 Every post you make displays how completely ignorant you are of the sciences.  Random changes happen as organisms reproduce; natural selection filters the changes that enhance survival from those that hinder it.  We are not an intentional end product and trying to explain things by assuming that we are is just wrong.  Once you let go of that erroneous and incredibly arrogant assumption things make much more sense and don't require a magical overseer.



Evidence please.  What would be the point of creating fleshbots that are "in serious need of improvement" to entrap pre-existing spritis in order to "test" them to see if they are worthy?  The gnostic ideas were dismissed as heretical nearly two thousand years ago.  You are behind the curve on this one.



Good for you but you sound like a 4-year-old stamping her little feet and refusing to east her green beans.  When you start with what you want to be true your conclusions are worthless.



Only if you are incredibly gullible. There are many claims but nothing testable or verifiable.
Everena: Wrong, he tested and verified and followed the scientific method.


"So the universe is not quite as you thought it was. You’d better rearrange your beliefs, then. Because you certainly can’t rearrange the universe." -- Isaac Asimov

---

That's fantastic. No one is saying evolution is not true. We are saying the complex code of DNA did not create itself.

So you change the goalposts when your assertion is disproven. How very christian of you.

PS as both you and cdf are socks of each other I reported both of ye.

I am not a Christian and nothing has been disproven.