RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
November 13, 2018 at 4:39 pm
(This post was last modified: November 13, 2018 at 4:46 pm by Everena.)
(November 13, 2018 at 2:11 pm)Khemikal Wrote:(November 13, 2018 at 2:05 pm)Everena Wrote: Everena: I understand evolution and natural selection far better than you do. It is a process fool, not a first cause of anything. The ability of have a sex drive and genitals had to be there inititially or it never would have happened!! What part of that is HARD for someone like you to understand? Perhaps read it twice and then retake high school level biology.Neither sex drives nor genitalia were present at the outset of life (or for quite some time thereafter). They simply weren't required. In this, both things are very much like your meat fairy..though, unlike your meat fairy..both did evolve and do now exist.
Everena: They weren't required but the capacity for them to exist WAS required
(November 13, 2018 at 2:18 pm)Mathilda Wrote:(November 13, 2018 at 2:16 pm)Everena Wrote: I don't have to pretend. I received A's in biology in high school and college. I doubt you even went to college and your faulty understanding of it is not my problem.
Oh well if we're arguing from authority.
I have a masters in evolutionary & adaptive systems. And also a PhD that made heavy use of artificial evolution.
You're talking shite.
Everena: You have a Phd in nothing if you are pretending that evolution was the first cause of life, food, or anything that exists on this planet.
(November 13, 2018 at 2:34 pm)Gwaithmir Wrote: Typical apologist evasion. I didn't ask you for your opinion or interpretation of the article. I asked you to quote the relevant passage(s) "....for proving the concept of eternal life when combined with the multiverse theory from quantum mechanics."
You're an idiot. Why would I quote something that has nothing to do with I stated. If you want to learn more about superposition and the multiverse theories, then look it up yourself. It's common knowledge.