DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[The Grand Nudger]

Dear Everena, 

The argument species can't change to other species, is weak at best and proven false at worst, but a better way to prove naturalism evolution didn't take place is to show irreducible complexity in life and design as a system. Not a particular thing that can't have evolved, but over all a structure, that has many different types of it existing, but is irreducible complex by design in an abstract way. This is true of consciousness for example and it's true of other things in nature which I will not mention which because then a whole argument will ensure on exactly those things, when people don't even understand the nature of the irreducible complexity problem with respect to small changes over time and big changes over large periods of time, and the impossibility of things that are binary or irreducible complex in nature.  

Most people on these forums to me have been proven to be either people who if they understand won't accept proofs by words, not sure about live miracles, or they don't have the ability and capacity to perceive truth and logic properly. They always perceive it in the worse way possible.

If science is going to prove naturalism wrong by biology, it lies in irreducible complexity. And so far, all arguments against this has been misunderstanding of it by the so called elite evolutionist scientists who supposedly have refuted it.

But I believe species can evolve into other species. It's not a problem for me.

---

What doesn't help also is dumb people making the case for irreducible complexity by things that by nature of design are not irreducibly complex like the eye which is not irreducibly complex, but people argue that it is. And it confuses people when they are refuted scientifically.

Exactly, you're not helping.  You can point to no example of irreducible complexity, and yet imagine that this is a way to "prove naturalism evolution did not take place".

Even this is a misunderstanding on your part.  GMO crops are -already- the unmistakable product of genetic engineering.  Their existence does not threaten modern synth or naturalism, and in point of fact their creation was made possible by an understanding of modern synth, in concert with wholly natural means, by a decidedly natural agent.  

If we were living in an alternate universe in which we, like a gmo crop, were the unmistakable product of genetic engineering..it would no more suggest that fairies were real in that universe than the existence of gmo crops does in this one.